AURA vs BCRX

Aura Biosciences, Inc. vs BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

AURA

Biological Products, (No Diagnostic Substances)
Aura Biosciences, Inc.
Quality
5.2
out of 10
Value Trap
24
SAFE
Price
$7.47
Last close
Models
9/13
Active
VS

BCRX

Biological Products, (No Diagnostic Substances)
BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Quality
6.9
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$8.91
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType AURA Fair ValueAURA Upside BCRX Fair ValueBCRX Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $2.43 -67.4% $14.22 +66.7%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $2.33 -74.2%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $0.59 -92.1% $0.52 -94.2%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for AURA vs BCRX — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

AURA vs BCRX — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

BCRX scores higher with a 6.9/10 quality rating vs AURA's 5.2/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Aura Biosciences, Inc. (AURA) and BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (BCRX) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

AURA currently trades at $7.47 with a QOC of 5.2/10, while BCRX trades at $8.91 with a QOC of 6.9/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).