AUPH vs AXSM

Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc vs Axsome Therapeutics, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

AUPH

Pharmaceutical Preparations
Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc
Quality
9.9
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$15.33
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

AXSM

Pharmaceutical Preparations
Axsome Therapeutics, Inc.
Quality
6.1
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$234.48
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType AUPH Fair ValueAUPH Upside AXSM Fair ValueAXSM Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $15.98 +4.3% $79.19 -66.2%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $6.74 -56.0% $82.92 -55.4%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for AUPH vs AXSM — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

AUPH vs AXSM — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

AUPH scores higher with a 9.9/10 quality rating vs AXSM's 6.1/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc (AUPH) and Axsome Therapeutics, Inc. (AXSM) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

AUPH currently trades at $15.33 with a QOC of 9.9/10, while AXSM trades at $234.48 with a QOC of 6.1/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).