Is ATR or CMT more undervalued in 2026?

CirclFi compares AptarGroup, Inc. (ATR) and Core Molding Technologies Inc (CMT) using 13 institutional-grade valuation models. ATR has a Quality of Company score of 9.4/10 while CMT scores 8.3/10.

Which is a better buy — ATR or CMT?

Compare intrinsic values from 13 independent models against current market prices. CirclFi also calculates Value Trap scores. This is not financial advice — conduct your own analysis.

How do ATR and CMT valuations compare?

ATR at $115.85 and CMT at $23.69 are compared across Bayesian DCF, EPV, EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, and 8 additional models.

ATR vs CMT Valuation Comparison 2026 — Intrinsic Value Analysis

ATR

Plastics Products, NEC

AptarGroup, Inc.

Quality

9.4

out of 10

Value Trap

—

Price

$115.85

Last close

Models

13/13

Active

CMT

Plastics Products, NEC

Core Molding Technologies Inc

Quality

8.3

out of 10

Value Trap

—

Price

$23.69

Last close

Models

13/13

Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

Model	Type	ATR Fair Value	ATR Upside	CMT Fair Value	CMT Upside
Bayesian DCF	Intrinsic	$46.26	-60.1%	$6.51	-72.5%
Earnings Power Value	Intrinsic	$49.33	-57.4%	$3.15	-86.7%
EROIC Spread	Intrinsic	$•••.••	••.•%	$•••.••	••.•%
First Chicago	Scenario	$•••.••	••.•%	$•••.••	••.•%
Markov DDM	Intrinsic	$•••.••	••.•%	$•••.••	••.•%
ML-RIV	Intrinsic	$•••.••	••.•%	$•••.••	••.•%
Dynamic NAV	Asset-Based	$•••.••	••.•%	$•••.••	••.•%
PWERM	Option-Based	$•••.••	••.•%	$•••.••	••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional	Relative	$•••.••	••.•%	$•••.••	••.•%
Sentiment SOTP	Hybrid	$•••.••	••.•%	$•••.••	••.•%
CUCE Ensemble	Ensemble	$•••.••	••.•%	$•••.••	••.•%
FTNN Topology	Relative	$•••.••	••.•%	$•••.••	••.•%
RCMH-DCF	Intrinsic	$•••.••	••.•%	$•••.••	••.•%

🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for ATR vs CMT — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

ATR vs CMT — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

ATR scores higher with a 9.4/10 quality rating vs CMT's 8.3/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing AptarGroup, Inc. (ATR) and Core Molding Technologies Inc (CMT) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

ATR currently trades at $115.85 with a QOC of 9.4/10, while CMT trades at $23.69 with a QOC of 8.3/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).