ASTE vs MTW

Astec Industries, Inc. vs Manitowoc Company, Inc. (The) — Valuation Comparison 2026

ASTE

Construction Machinery & Equip
Astec Industries, Inc.
Quality
9.0
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$50.36
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

MTW

Construction Machinery & Equip
Manitowoc Company, Inc. (The)
Quality
6.8
out of 10
Value Trap
16
SAFE
Price
$11.83
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType ASTE Fair ValueASTE Upside MTW Fair ValueMTW Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $19.65 -61.0% $0.76 -93.4%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $9.91 -80.3%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $22.99 -54.3% $16.25 +37.3%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for ASTE vs MTW — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

ASTE vs MTW — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

ASTE scores higher with a 9.0/10 quality rating vs MTW's 6.8/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Astec Industries, Inc. (ASTE) and Manitowoc Company, Inc. (The) (MTW) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

ASTE currently trades at $50.36 with a QOC of 9.0/10, while MTW trades at $11.83 with a QOC of 6.8/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).