ASPN vs CARR

Aspen Aerogels, Inc. vs Carrier Global Corporation — Valuation Comparison 2026

ASPN

Building Products & Equipment
Aspen Aerogels, Inc.
Quality
5.8
out of 10
Value Trap
39
LOW
Price
$6.37
Last close
Models
11/13
Active
VS

CARR

Building Products & Equipment
Carrier Global Corporation
Quality
7.6
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$63.81
Last close
Models
11/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType ASPN Fair ValueASPN Upside CARR Fair ValueCARR Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $8.17 +28.3% $29.09 -54.4%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $33.54 +426.6% $27.68 -56.6%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for ASPN vs CARR — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

ASPN vs CARR — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

CARR scores higher with a 7.6/10 quality rating vs ASPN's 5.8/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Aspen Aerogels, Inc. (ASPN) and Carrier Global Corporation (CARR) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

ASPN currently trades at $6.37 with a QOC of 5.8/10, while CARR trades at $63.81 with a QOC of 7.6/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).