APO vs ARES

Apollo Global Management, Inc. vs Ares Management Corporation — Valuation Comparison 2026

APO

Asset Management
Apollo Global Management, Inc.
Quality
9.0
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$127.51
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

ARES

Asset Management
Ares Management Corporation
Quality
8.7
out of 10
Value Trap
55
WARN
Price
$126.00
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType APO Fair ValueAPO Upside ARES Fair ValueARES Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $243.74 +91.2% $308.77 +145.1%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $56.56 -55.6% $38.23 -69.7%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for APO vs ARES — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

APO vs ARES — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

APO scores higher with a 9.0/10 quality rating vs ARES's 8.7/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Apollo Global Management, Inc. (APO) and Ares Management Corporation (ARES) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

APO currently trades at $127.51 with a QOC of 9.0/10, while ARES trades at $126.00 with a QOC of 8.7/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).