AIG vs HIG

American International Group, I vs The Hartford Insurance Group, I — Valuation Comparison 2026

AIG

Insurance - Diversified
American International Group, I
Quality
7.9
out of 10
Value Trap
23
SAFE
Price
$74.40
Last close
Models
11/13
Active
VS

HIG

Insurance - Diversified
The Hartford Insurance Group, I
Quality
8.9
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$128.97
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType AIG Fair ValueAIG Upside HIG Fair ValueHIG Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $80.12 +7.7% $356.99 +176.8%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $198.60 +166.9% $123.33 -4.4%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for AIG vs HIG — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

AIG vs HIG — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

HIG scores higher with a 8.9/10 quality rating vs AIG's 7.9/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing American International Group, I (AIG) and The Hartford Insurance Group, I (HIG) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

AIG currently trades at $74.40 with a QOC of 7.9/10, while HIG trades at $128.97 with a QOC of 8.9/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).