AGCO vs ASTE

AGCO Corporation vs Astec Industries, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

AGCO

Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery
AGCO Corporation
Quality
8.8
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$113.87
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

ASTE

Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery
Astec Industries, Inc.
Quality
9.0
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$50.54
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType AGCO Fair ValueAGCO Upside ASTE Fair ValueASTE Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $77.74 -31.7% $19.50 -61.4%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $63.75 -44.0% $9.91 -80.4%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for AGCO vs ASTE — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

AGCO vs ASTE — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

ASTE scores higher with a 9.0/10 quality rating vs AGCO's 8.8/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing AGCO Corporation (AGCO) and Astec Industries, Inc. (ASTE) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

AGCO currently trades at $113.87 with a QOC of 8.8/10, while ASTE trades at $50.54 with a QOC of 9.0/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).