AFYA vs APEI

Afya Limited vs American Public Education, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

AFYA

Education & Training Services
Afya Limited
Quality
8.8
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$14.05
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

APEI

Education & Training Services
American Public Education, Inc.
Quality
9.1
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$50.98
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType AFYA Fair ValueAFYA Upside APEI Fair ValueAPEI Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $16.05 +14.3% $28.96 -43.2%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $25.48 +81.3% $37.55 -26.3%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for AFYA vs APEI — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

AFYA vs APEI — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

APEI scores higher with a 9.1/10 quality rating vs AFYA's 8.8/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Afya Limited (AFYA) and American Public Education, Inc. (APEI) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

AFYA currently trades at $14.05 with a QOC of 8.8/10, while APEI trades at $50.98 with a QOC of 9.1/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).