AEBI vs ALG

Aebi Schmidt Holding AG vs Alamo Group, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

AEBI

Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery
Aebi Schmidt Holding AG
Quality
6.7
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$12.91
Last close
Models
11/13
Active
VS

ALG

Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery
Alamo Group, Inc.
Quality
9.3
out of 10
Value Trap
5
SAFE
Price
$152.48
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType AEBI Fair ValueAEBI Upside ALG Fair ValueALG Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $72.33 -52.6%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $2.25 -82.5% $52.84 -65.3%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $0.98 -92.4% $167.46 +9.8%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for AEBI vs ALG — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

AEBI vs ALG — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

ALG scores higher with a 9.3/10 quality rating vs AEBI's 6.7/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Aebi Schmidt Holding AG (AEBI) and Alamo Group, Inc. (ALG) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

AEBI currently trades at $12.91 with a QOC of 6.7/10, while ALG trades at $152.48 with a QOC of 9.3/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).