ABEV vs SAM

Ambev S.A. vs Boston Beer Company, Inc. (The) — Valuation Comparison 2026

ABEV

Beverages - Brewers
Ambev S.A.
Quality
8.6
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$3.20
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

SAM

Beverages - Brewers
Boston Beer Company, Inc. (The)
Quality
7.8
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$180.45
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType ABEV Fair ValueABEV Upside SAM Fair ValueSAM Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $1.69 -47.2% $246.26 +36.5%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $3.67 +14.6% $65.60 -63.6%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for ABEV vs SAM — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

ABEV vs SAM — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

ABEV scores higher with a 8.6/10 quality rating vs SAM's 7.8/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Ambev S.A. (ABEV) and Boston Beer Company, Inc. (The) (SAM) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

ABEV currently trades at $3.20 with a QOC of 8.6/10, while SAM trades at $180.45 with a QOC of 7.8/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).