XERS vs ZYBT

Xeris Biopharma Holdings, Inc. vs Zhengye Biotechnology Holding L — Valuation Comparison 2026

XERS

Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Xeris Biopharma Holdings, Inc.
Quality
8.6
out of 10
Value Trap
35
LOW
Price
$6.32
Last close
Models
11/13
Active
VS

ZYBT

Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Zhengye Biotechnology Holding L
Quality
6.3
out of 10
Value Trap
8
SAFE
Price
$0.81
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType XERS Fair ValueXERS Upside ZYBT Fair ValueZYBT Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $1.44 -77.1% $0.66 -18.7%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $0.13 -97.9% $0.82 -10.4%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for XERS vs ZYBT — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

XERS vs ZYBT — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

XERS scores higher with a 8.6/10 quality rating vs ZYBT's 6.3/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Xeris Biopharma Holdings, Inc. (XERS) and Zhengye Biotechnology Holding L (ZYBT) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

XERS currently trades at $6.32 with a QOC of 8.6/10, while ZYBT trades at $0.81 with a QOC of 6.3/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).