WRLD vs WU

World Acceptance Corporation vs Western Union Company (The) — Valuation Comparison 2026

WRLD

Credit Services
World Acceptance Corporation
Quality
6.3
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$161.51
Last close
Models
11/13
Active
VS

WU

Credit Services
Western Union Company (The)
Quality
3.5
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$8.11
Last close
Models
11/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType WRLD Fair ValueWRLD Upside WU Fair ValueWU Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $730.70 +352.4% $0.77 -90.5%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $18.19 -88.0%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $2.12 -76.2%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for WRLD vs WU — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

WRLD vs WU — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

WRLD scores higher with a 6.3/10 quality rating vs WU's 3.5/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing World Acceptance Corporation (WRLD) and Western Union Company (The) (WU) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

WRLD currently trades at $161.51 with a QOC of 6.3/10, while WU trades at $8.11 with a QOC of 3.5/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).