WFRD vs WHD

Weatherford International plc vs Cactus, Inc. Class A Common Sto — Valuation Comparison 2026

WFRD

Oil & Gas Field Machinery & Equipment
Weatherford International plc
Quality
9.4
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$103.64
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

WHD

Oil & Gas Field Machinery & Equipment
Cactus, Inc. Class A Common Sto
Quality
9.3
out of 10
Value Trap
31
LOW
Price
$58.04
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType WFRD Fair ValueWFRD Upside WHD Fair ValueWHD Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $97.43 -6.0% $31.12 -46.4%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $56.32 -45.7% $25.29 -56.4%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for WFRD vs WHD — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

WFRD vs WHD — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

WFRD scores higher with a 9.4/10 quality rating vs WHD's 9.3/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Weatherford International plc (WFRD) and Cactus, Inc. Class A Common Sto (WHD) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

WFRD currently trades at $103.64 with a QOC of 9.4/10, while WHD trades at $58.04 with a QOC of 9.3/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).