WD vs WULF

Walker & Dunlop, Inc vs TeraWulf Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

WD

Finance Services
Walker & Dunlop, Inc
Quality
5.7
out of 10
Value Trap
37
LOW
Price
$50.19
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

WULF

Finance Services
TeraWulf Inc.
Quality
5.0
out of 10
Value Trap
24
SAFE
Price
$25.56
Last close
Models
6/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType WD Fair ValueWD Upside WULF Fair ValueWULF Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $283.05 +464.0% $7.47 -70.8%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $59.26 +18.1%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $96.99 +93.2% $3.48 -82.6%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for WD vs WULF — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

WD vs WULF — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

WD scores higher with a 5.7/10 quality rating vs WULF's 5.0/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Walker & Dunlop, Inc (WD) and TeraWulf Inc. (WULF) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

WD currently trades at $50.19 with a QOC of 5.7/10, while WULF trades at $25.56 with a QOC of 5.0/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).