WBS vs WSBF

Webster Financial Corporation vs Waterstone Financial, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

WBS

Banks - Regional
Webster Financial Corporation
Quality
5.9
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$72.65
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

WSBF

Banks - Regional
Waterstone Financial, Inc.
Quality
6.6
out of 10
Value Trap
37
LOW
Price
$18.68
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType WBS Fair ValueWBS Upside WSBF Fair ValueWSBF Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $43.58 -40.0% $36.84 +97.2%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $63.21 -13.0% $5.65 -68.8%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for WBS vs WSBF — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

WBS vs WSBF — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

WSBF scores higher with a 6.6/10 quality rating vs WBS's 5.9/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Webster Financial Corporation (WBS) and Waterstone Financial, Inc. (WSBF) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

WBS currently trades at $72.65 with a QOC of 5.9/10, while WSBF trades at $18.68 with a QOC of 6.6/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).