VLY vs WBS

Valley National Bancorp vs Webster Financial Corporation — Valuation Comparison 2026

VLY

National Commercial Banks
Valley National Bancorp
Quality
7.5
out of 10
Value Trap
20
SAFE
Price
$13.77
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

WBS

National Commercial Banks
Webster Financial Corporation
Quality
5.9
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$72.72
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType VLY Fair ValueVLY Upside WBS Fair ValueWBS Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $3.17 -77.0% $43.59 -40.1%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $11.32 -17.8% $63.21 -13.1%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for VLY vs WBS — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

VLY vs WBS — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

VLY scores higher with a 7.5/10 quality rating vs WBS's 5.9/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Valley National Bancorp (VLY) and Webster Financial Corporation (WBS) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

VLY currently trades at $13.77 with a QOC of 7.5/10, while WBS trades at $72.72 with a QOC of 5.9/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).