VISN vs VSAT

Vistance Networks, Inc. vs ViaSat, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

VISN

Communication Equipment
Vistance Networks, Inc.
Quality
7.1
out of 10
Value Trap
20
SAFE
Price
$12.37
Last close
Models
11/13
Active
VS

VSAT

Communication Equipment
ViaSat, Inc.
Quality
6.6
out of 10
Value Trap
29
LOW
Price
$86.69
Last close
Models
11/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType VISN Fair ValueVISN Upside VSAT Fair ValueVSAT Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $30.55 -64.8%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $27.97 +134.5% $16.66 -73.1%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $10.70 -44.9% $10.79 -82.6%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for VISN vs VSAT — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

VISN vs VSAT — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

VISN scores higher with a 7.1/10 quality rating vs VSAT's 6.6/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Vistance Networks, Inc. (VISN) and ViaSat, Inc. (VSAT) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

VISN currently trades at $12.37 with a QOC of 7.1/10, while VSAT trades at $86.69 with a QOC of 6.6/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).