VET vs VIST

Vermilion Energy Inc. vs Vista Energy S.A.B. de C.V. — Valuation Comparison 2026

VET

Crude Petroleum & Natural Gas
Vermilion Energy Inc.
Quality
1.7
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$11.13
Last close
Models
11/13
Active
VS

VIST

Crude Petroleum & Natural Gas
Vista Energy S.A.B. de C.V.
Quality
2.0
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$74.20
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType VET Fair ValueVET Upside VIST Fair ValueVIST Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $3.36 -69.8% $34.67 -53.3%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $40.86 -44.2%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $3.50 -70.5% $0.11 -99.8%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for VET vs VIST — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

VET vs VIST — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

VIST scores higher with a 2.0/10 quality rating vs VET's 1.7/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Vermilion Energy Inc. (VET) and Vista Energy S.A.B. de C.V. (VIST) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

VET currently trades at $11.13 with a QOC of 1.7/10, while VIST trades at $74.20 with a QOC of 2.0/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).