UVE vs WTM

UNIVERSAL INSURANCE HOLDINGS IN vs White Mountains Insurance Group — Valuation Comparison 2026

UVE

Insurance - Property & Casualty
UNIVERSAL INSURANCE HOLDINGS IN
Quality
9.2
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$37.57
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

WTM

Insurance - Property & Casualty
White Mountains Insurance Group
Quality
8.7
out of 10
Value Trap
34
LOW
Price
$2084.31
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType UVE Fair ValueUVE Upside WTM Fair ValueWTM Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $132.25 +252.0% $3424.46 +64.3%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $73.98 +96.9% $1245.24 -42.4%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for UVE vs WTM — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

UVE vs WTM — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

UVE scores higher with a 9.2/10 quality rating vs WTM's 8.7/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing UNIVERSAL INSURANCE HOLDINGS IN (UVE) and White Mountains Insurance Group (WTM) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

UVE currently trades at $37.57 with a QOC of 9.2/10, while WTM trades at $2084.31 with a QOC of 8.7/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).