UTI vs WAFU

Universal Technical Institute I vs Wah Fu Education Group Limited — Valuation Comparison 2026

UTI

Education & Training Services
Universal Technical Institute I
Quality
7.6
out of 10
Value Trap
24
SAFE
Price
$39.03
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

WAFU

Education & Training Services
Wah Fu Education Group Limited
Quality
2.2
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$1.69
Last close
Models
11/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType UTI Fair ValueUTI Upside WAFU Fair ValueWAFU Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $16.05 -58.9% $0.58 -65.6%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $1.56 -96.0% $3.30 +102.4%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for UTI vs WAFU — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

UTI vs WAFU — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

UTI scores higher with a 7.6/10 quality rating vs WAFU's 2.2/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Universal Technical Institute I (UTI) and Wah Fu Education Group Limited (WAFU) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

UTI currently trades at $39.03 with a QOC of 7.6/10, while WAFU trades at $1.69 with a QOC of 2.2/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).