UMBFO vs UVSP

UMB Financial Corporation - Dep vs Univest Financial Corporation — Valuation Comparison 2026

UMBFO

Banks - Regional
UMB Financial Corporation - Dep
Quality
7.7
out of 10
Value Trap
26
LOW
Price
$26.96
Last close
Models
3/13
Active
VS

UVSP

Banks - Regional
Univest Financial Corporation
Quality
8.7
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$39.38
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType UMBFO Fair ValueUMBFO Upside UVSP Fair ValueUVSP Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $20.41 -48.2%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $31.27 -20.6%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $132.71 +392.2% $22.83 -42.0%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $27.89 +3.5% $43.98 +11.7%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for UMBFO vs UVSP — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

UMBFO vs UVSP — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

UVSP scores higher with a 8.7/10 quality rating vs UMBFO's 7.7/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing UMB Financial Corporation - Dep (UMBFO) and Univest Financial Corporation (UVSP) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

UMBFO currently trades at $26.96 with a QOC of 7.7/10, while UVSP trades at $39.38 with a QOC of 8.7/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).