UG vs YCBD

United-Guardian, Inc. vs cbdMD, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

UG

Perfumes, Cosmetics & Other Toilet Preparations
United-Guardian, Inc.
Quality
8.5
out of 10
Value Trap
27
LOW
Price
$6.93
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

YCBD

Perfumes, Cosmetics & Other Toilet Preparations
cbdMD, Inc.
Quality
5.3
out of 10
Value Trap
37
LOW
Price
$0.79
Last close
Models
11/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType UG Fair ValueUG Upside YCBD Fair ValueYCBD Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $4.83 -30.3% $0.30 -61.7%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $2.74 -60.4% $2.68 +208.3%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for UG vs YCBD — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

UG vs YCBD — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

UG scores higher with a 8.5/10 quality rating vs YCBD's 5.3/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing United-Guardian, Inc. (UG) and cbdMD, Inc. (YCBD) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

UG currently trades at $6.93 with a QOC of 8.5/10, while YCBD trades at $0.79 with a QOC of 5.3/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).