UA vs XELB

Under Armour, Inc. vs Xcel Brands, Inc — Valuation Comparison 2026

UA

Apparel Manufacturing
Under Armour, Inc.
Quality
4.7
out of 10
Value Trap
24
SAFE
Price
$5.84
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

XELB

Apparel Manufacturing
Xcel Brands, Inc
Quality
4.0
out of 10
Value Trap
40
WARN
Price
$2.14
Last close
Models
11/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType UA Fair ValueUA Upside XELB Fair ValueXELB Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $2.71 -53.6% $0.65 -70.5%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $9.02 +48.5% $5.85 +152.5%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for UA vs XELB — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

UA vs XELB — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

UA scores higher with a 4.7/10 quality rating vs XELB's 4.0/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Under Armour, Inc. (UA) and Xcel Brands, Inc (XELB) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

UA currently trades at $5.84 with a QOC of 4.7/10, while XELB trades at $2.14 with a QOC of 4.0/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).