TPVG vs TROW

TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC vs T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

TPVG

Asset Management
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC
Quality
6.1
out of 10
Value Trap
28
LOW
Price
$5.55
Last close
Models
11/13
Active
VS

TROW

Asset Management
T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.
Quality
8.7
out of 10
Value Trap
27
LOW
Price
$103.55
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType TPVG Fair ValueTPVG Upside TROW Fair ValueTROW Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $0.50 -90.9% $136.34 +31.7%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $1.41 -74.7% $98.31 -5.1%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for TPVG vs TROW — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

TPVG vs TROW — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

TROW scores higher with a 8.7/10 quality rating vs TPVG's 6.1/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC (TPVG) and T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. (TROW) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

TPVG currently trades at $5.55 with a QOC of 6.1/10, while TROW trades at $103.55 with a QOC of 8.7/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).