TPR vs VRA

Tapestry, Inc. vs Vera Bradley, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

TPR

Leather & Leather Products
Tapestry, Inc.
Quality
9.7
out of 10
Value Trap
26
LOW
Price
$145.46
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

VRA

Leather & Leather Products
Vera Bradley, Inc.
Quality
5.5
out of 10
Value Trap
44
WARN
Price
$3.31
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType TPR Fair ValueTPR Upside VRA Fair ValueVRA Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $45.65 -68.6% $12.32 +197.7%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $111.90 -23.1% $0.08 -97.7%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for TPR vs VRA — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

TPR vs VRA — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

TPR scores higher with a 9.7/10 quality rating vs VRA's 5.5/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Tapestry, Inc. (TPR) and Vera Bradley, Inc. (VRA) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

TPR currently trades at $145.46 with a QOC of 9.7/10, while VRA trades at $3.31 with a QOC of 5.5/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).