Quick Summary — TMP scores higher on quality with 8.6/10 vs UBCP's 7.7/10. TMP trades at $86.09 while UBCP trades at $16.05. Both analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR data across 13 institutional models.
TMP scores higher with a 8.6/10 quality rating vs UBCP's 7.7/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.
At $86.09, TMP trades +96.5% above its Bayesian DCF fair value of $3.04, while UBCP at $16.05 trades +44.5% above its estimate of $8.90. TMP shows a wider gap between price and intrinsic value.
TMP earns a Quality of Company score of 8.6/10 compared to UBCP's 7.7/10. The scores are closely matched, indicating similar fundamental quality profiles. The QOC score synthesizes 32 signals spanning profitability margins, revenue growth, free cash flow, capital allocation, and leverage.
TMP carries a SAFE value trap risk (6/100) while UBCP shows SAFE risk (21/100). Both companies show manageable value trap risk, suggesting their current valuations are not artificially depressed by fundamental deterioration.
Both TMP and UBCP operate in Banks - Regional, which has 329 stocks tracked by CirclFi. Same-industry comparisons provide the most direct insight into relative valuation since both companies face similar regulatory environments, market dynamics, and competitive pressures. Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN), and ensemble methods (CUCE).
11 hidden models compare TMP vs UBCP differently — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more. Some may disagree with the 2 you see above.
Bloomberg Terminal: ~$2,000/mo · FactSet: ~$1,000/mo · CirclFi: $0.90/day
See All 13 Models — $0.90/dayWe don’t predict prices. We show you what 13 independent mathematical frameworks say a stock is worth — and let you decide.