TECK vs USLM

Teck Resources Ltd vs United States Lime & Minerals, — Valuation Comparison 2026

TECK

Mining & Quarrying of Nonmetallic Minerals (No Fuels)
Teck Resources Ltd
Quality
7.3
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$66.16
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

USLM

Mining & Quarrying of Nonmetallic Minerals (No Fuels)
United States Lime & Minerals,
Quality
10.0
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$113.99
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType TECK Fair ValueTECK Upside USLM Fair ValueUSLM Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $22.70 -65.7% $60.90 -46.6%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $17.95 -72.9% $50.47 -55.7%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for TECK vs USLM — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

TECK vs USLM — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

USLM scores higher with a 10.0/10 quality rating vs TECK's 7.3/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Teck Resources Ltd (TECK) and United States Lime & Minerals, (USLM) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

TECK currently trades at $66.16 with a QOC of 7.3/10, while USLM trades at $113.99 with a QOC of 10.0/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).