SYRE vs TAK

Spyre Therapeutics, Inc. vs Takeda Pharmaceutical Company L — Valuation Comparison 2026

SYRE

Pharmaceutical Preparations
Spyre Therapeutics, Inc.
Quality
5.4
out of 10
Value Trap
24
SAFE
Price
$73.50
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

TAK

Pharmaceutical Preparations
Takeda Pharmaceutical Company L
Quality
7.4
out of 10
Value Trap
39
LOW
Price
$15.96
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType SYRE Fair ValueSYRE Upside TAK Fair ValueTAK Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $22.39 -69.5% $36.57 +129.1%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $30.32 -56.5% $21.77 +36.4%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for SYRE vs TAK — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

SYRE vs TAK — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

TAK scores higher with a 7.4/10 quality rating vs SYRE's 5.4/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Spyre Therapeutics, Inc. (SYRE) and Takeda Pharmaceutical Company L (TAK) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

SYRE currently trades at $73.50 with a QOC of 5.4/10, while TAK trades at $15.96 with a QOC of 7.4/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).