SWKHL vs TROO

SWK Holdings Corporation - 9.00 vs TROOPS, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

SWKHL

Miscellaneous Business Credit Institution
SWK Holdings Corporation - 9.00
Quality
6.9
out of 10
Value Trap
20
SAFE
Price
$25.54
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

TROO

Miscellaneous Business Credit Institution
TROOPS, Inc.
Quality
2.3
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$4.16
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType SWKHL Fair ValueSWKHL Upside TROO Fair ValueTROO Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $101.73 +298.3% $0.82 -80.3%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $9.68 -62.1% $0.25 -94.4%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for SWKHL vs TROO — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

SWKHL vs TROO — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

SWKHL scores higher with a 6.9/10 quality rating vs TROO's 2.3/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing SWK Holdings Corporation - 9.00 (SWKHL) and TROOPS, Inc. (TROO) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

SWKHL currently trades at $25.54 with a QOC of 6.9/10, while TROO trades at $4.16 with a QOC of 2.3/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).