STRL vs VATE

Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. vs INNOVATE Corp. — Valuation Comparison 2026

STRL

Engineering & Construction
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.
Quality
10.0
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$842.96
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

VATE

Engineering & Construction
INNOVATE Corp.
Quality
6.2
out of 10
Value Trap
17
SAFE
Price
$14.40
Last close
Models
10/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType STRL Fair ValueSTRL Upside VATE Fair ValueVATE Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $195.23 -76.8% $73.82 +412.7%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $128.48 -84.8% $54.47 +278.2%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for STRL vs VATE — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

STRL vs VATE — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

STRL scores higher with a 10.0/10 quality rating vs VATE's 6.2/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. (STRL) and INNOVATE Corp. (VATE) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

STRL currently trades at $842.96 with a QOC of 10.0/10, while VATE trades at $14.40 with a QOC of 6.2/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).