SRFM vs UAL

Surf Air Mobility Inc. vs United Airlines Holdings, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

SRFM

Airlines
Surf Air Mobility Inc.
Quality
4.8
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$1.29
Last close
Models
7/13
Active
VS

UAL

Airlines
United Airlines Holdings, Inc.
Quality
8.4
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$115.06
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType SRFM Fair ValueSRFM Upside UAL Fair ValueUAL Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $0.23 -81.8% $91.42 -20.5%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $38.79 -66.3%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $2.69 +108.7% $166.08 +44.3%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for SRFM vs UAL — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

SRFM vs UAL — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

UAL scores higher with a 8.4/10 quality rating vs SRFM's 4.8/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Surf Air Mobility Inc. (SRFM) and United Airlines Holdings, Inc. (UAL) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

SRFM currently trades at $1.29 with a QOC of 4.8/10, while UAL trades at $115.06 with a QOC of 8.4/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).