SPAI vs SWBI

Safe Pro Group Inc. vs Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

SPAI

Aerospace & Defense
Safe Pro Group Inc.
Quality
5.4
out of 10
Value Trap
20
SAFE
Price
$5.41
Last close
Models
11/13
Active
VS

SWBI

Aerospace & Defense
Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc.
Quality
7.7
out of 10
Value Trap
26
LOW
Price
$15.22
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType SPAI Fair ValueSPAI Upside SWBI Fair ValueSWBI Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $1.83 -66.2% $39.04 +156.5%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $0.62 -86.2% $2.76 -81.9%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for SPAI vs SWBI — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

SPAI vs SWBI — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

SWBI scores higher with a 7.7/10 quality rating vs SPAI's 5.4/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Safe Pro Group Inc. (SPAI) and Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. (SWBI) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

SPAI currently trades at $5.41 with a QOC of 5.4/10, while SWBI trades at $15.22 with a QOC of 7.7/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).