SONY vs WTO

Sony Group Corporation vs UTime Limited — Valuation Comparison 2026

SONY

Consumer Electronics
Sony Group Corporation
Quality
8.4
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$21.72
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

WTO

Consumer Electronics
UTime Limited
Quality
4.7
out of 10
Value Trap
45
WARN
Price
$1.02
Last close
Models
4/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType SONY Fair ValueSONY Upside WTO Fair ValueWTO Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $13.30 -38.8% $2.45 +140.1%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $8.17 -63.2% $3.94 +162.8%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for SONY vs WTO — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

SONY vs WTO — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

SONY scores higher with a 8.4/10 quality rating vs WTO's 4.7/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Sony Group Corporation (SONY) and UTime Limited (WTO) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

SONY currently trades at $21.72 with a QOC of 8.4/10, while WTO trades at $1.02 with a QOC of 4.7/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).