SNBR vs WHR

Sleep Number Corporation vs Whirlpool Corporation — Valuation Comparison 2026

SNBR

Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Sleep Number Corporation
Quality
5.3
out of 10
Value Trap
35
LOW
Price
$1.82
Last close
Models
5/13
Active
VS

WHR

Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Whirlpool Corporation
Quality
7.4
out of 10
Value Trap
23
SAFE
Price
$44.07
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType SNBR Fair ValueSNBR Upside WHR Fair ValueWHR Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $55.06 +24.9%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $4.93 -88.4%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $5.77 +216.8% $112.71 +155.8%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $0.77 -50.7% $110.30 +150.3%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for SNBR vs WHR — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

SNBR vs WHR — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

WHR scores higher with a 7.4/10 quality rating vs SNBR's 5.3/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Sleep Number Corporation (SNBR) and Whirlpool Corporation (WHR) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

SNBR currently trades at $1.82 with a QOC of 5.3/10, while WHR trades at $44.07 with a QOC of 7.4/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).