SNA vs SWK

Snap-On Incorporated vs Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

SNA

Cutlery, Handtools & General Hardware
Snap-On Incorporated
Quality
9.7
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$371.21
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

SWK

Cutlery, Handtools & General Hardware
Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.
Quality
6.5
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$79.42
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType SNA Fair ValueSNA Upside SWK Fair ValueSWK Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $347.34 -6.4% $4.83 -93.7%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $180.12 -51.5%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $490.04 +32.0% $78.15 +2.0%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for SNA vs SWK — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

SNA vs SWK — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

SNA scores higher with a 9.7/10 quality rating vs SWK's 6.5/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Snap-On Incorporated (SNA) and Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (SWK) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

SNA currently trades at $371.21 with a QOC of 9.7/10, while SWK trades at $79.42 with a QOC of 6.5/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).