Quick Summary — SMA scores higher on quality with 6.8/10 vs SQFTP's 6.1/10. SMA trades at $30.71 while SQFTP trades at $5.75. Both analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR data across 13 institutional models.
SMA scores higher with a 6.8/10 quality rating vs SQFTP's 6.1/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.
At $30.71, SMA trades +57.5% above its Bayesian DCF fair value of $13.06, while SQFTP at $5.75 trades +69.2% below its estimate of $11.02. SQFTP shows a wider gap between price and intrinsic value.
SMA earns a Quality of Company score of 6.8/10 compared to SQFTP's 6.1/10. The scores are closely matched, indicating similar fundamental quality profiles. The QOC score synthesizes 32 signals spanning profitability margins, revenue growth, free cash flow, capital allocation, and leverage.
SMA carries a SAFE value trap risk (12/100) while SQFTP shows LOW risk (31/100). Both companies show manageable value trap risk, suggesting their current valuations are not artificially depressed by fundamental deterioration.
Both SMA and SQFTP operate in Real Estate Investment Trusts, which has 186 stocks tracked by CirclFi. Same-industry comparisons provide the most direct insight into relative valuation since both companies face similar regulatory environments, market dynamics, and competitive pressures. Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN), and ensemble methods (CUCE).
11 hidden models compare SMA vs SQFTP differently — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more. Some may disagree with the 2 you see above.
Bloomberg Terminal: ~$2,000/mo · FactSet: ~$1,000/mo · CirclFi: $0.90/day
See All 13 Models — $0.90/dayWe don’t predict prices. We show you what 13 independent mathematical frameworks say a stock is worth — and let you decide.