SLNG vs SR

Stabilis Solutions, Inc. vs Spire Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

SLNG

Natural Gas Distribution
Stabilis Solutions, Inc.
Quality
6.9
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$3.68
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

SR

Natural Gas Distribution
Spire Inc.
Quality
7.6
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$82.26
Last close
Models
11/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType SLNG Fair ValueSLNG Upside SR Fair ValueSR Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $2.06 -44.1% $43.90 -46.6%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $1.96 -54.6%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $1.64 -55.3% $26.51 -67.8%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for SLNG vs SR — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

SLNG vs SR — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

SR scores higher with a 7.6/10 quality rating vs SLNG's 6.9/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Stabilis Solutions, Inc. (SLNG) and Spire Inc. (SR) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

SLNG currently trades at $3.68 with a QOC of 6.9/10, while SR trades at $82.26 with a QOC of 7.6/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).