SITE vs WXM

SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. vs WF International Limited — Valuation Comparison 2026

SITE

Industrial Distribution
SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc.
Quality
9.3
out of 10
Value Trap
39
LOW
Price
$111.72
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

WXM

Industrial Distribution
WF International Limited
Quality
6.5
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$0.46
Last close
Models
10/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType SITE Fair ValueSITE Upside WXM Fair ValueWXM Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $74.20 -33.6% $0.19 -59.0%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $15.97 -85.7% $0.72 +70.6%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for SITE vs WXM — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

SITE vs WXM — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

SITE scores higher with a 9.3/10 quality rating vs WXM's 6.5/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. (SITE) and WF International Limited (WXM) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

SITE currently trades at $111.72 with a QOC of 9.3/10, while WXM trades at $0.46 with a QOC of 6.5/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).