SHIM vs STRL

Shimmick Corporation vs Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

SHIM

Engineering & Construction
Shimmick Corporation
Quality
4.9
out of 10
Value Trap
19
SAFE
Price
$3.57
Last close
Models
10/13
Active
VS

STRL

Engineering & Construction
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.
Quality
10.0
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$842.96
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType SHIM Fair ValueSHIM Upside STRL Fair ValueSTRL Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $0.20 -94.4% $195.23 -76.8%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $6.28 +16.4% $128.48 -84.8%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for SHIM vs STRL — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

SHIM vs STRL — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

STRL scores higher with a 10.0/10 quality rating vs SHIM's 4.9/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Shimmick Corporation (SHIM) and Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. (STRL) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

SHIM currently trades at $3.57 with a QOC of 4.9/10, while STRL trades at $842.96 with a QOC of 10.0/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).