SGML vs USAR

Sigma Lithium Corporation vs USA Rare Earth, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

SGML

Metal Mining
Sigma Lithium Corporation
Quality
2.4
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$16.77
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

USAR

Metal Mining
USA Rare Earth, Inc.
Quality
5.5
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$28.01
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType SGML Fair ValueSGML Upside USAR Fair ValueUSAR Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $4.24 -74.7% $11.62 -58.5%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $0.46 -97.9% $2.95 -88.8%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for SGML vs USAR — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

SGML vs USAR — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

USAR scores higher with a 5.5/10 quality rating vs SGML's 2.4/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Sigma Lithium Corporation (SGML) and USA Rare Earth, Inc. (USAR) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

SGML currently trades at $16.77 with a QOC of 2.4/10, while USAR trades at $28.01 with a QOC of 5.5/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).