SERV vs TAYD

Serve Robotics Inc. vs Taylor Devices, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

SERV

General Industrial Machinery & Equipment, NEC
Serve Robotics Inc.
Quality
4.9
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$9.35
Last close
Models
9/13
Active
VS

TAYD

General Industrial Machinery & Equipment, NEC
Taylor Devices, Inc.
Quality
10.0
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$51.00
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType SERV Fair ValueSERV Upside TAYD Fair ValueTAYD Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $2.55 -72.7% $13.58 -73.4%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $17.25 -66.2%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $2.44 -73.9% $12.19 -76.1%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for SERV vs TAYD — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

SERV vs TAYD — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

TAYD scores higher with a 10.0/10 quality rating vs SERV's 4.9/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Serve Robotics Inc. (SERV) and Taylor Devices, Inc. (TAYD) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

SERV currently trades at $9.35 with a QOC of 4.9/10, while TAYD trades at $51.00 with a QOC of 10.0/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).