Is SEB or TUSK more undervalued in 2026?

CirclFi compares Seaboard Corporation (SEB) and Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (TUSK) using 13 institutional-grade valuation models. SEB has a Quality of Company score of 8.6/10 while TUSK scores 5.0/10.

Which is a better buy — SEB or TUSK?

Compare intrinsic values from 13 independent models against current market prices. CirclFi also calculates Value Trap scores. This is not financial advice — conduct your own analysis.

How do SEB and TUSK valuations compare?

SEB at $5047.22 and TUSK at $3.21 are compared across Bayesian DCF, EPV, EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, and 8 additional models.

SEB vs TUSK Valuation Comparison 2026 — Intrinsic Value Analysis

SEB

Conglomerates

Seaboard Corporation

Quality

8.6

out of 10

Value Trap

SAFE

Price

$5047.22

Last close

Models

12/13

Active

TUSK

Conglomerates

Mammoth Energy Services, Inc.

Quality

5.0

out of 10

Value Trap

LOW

Price

$3.21

Last close

Models

9/13

Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

Model	Type	SEB Fair Value	SEB Upside	TUSK Fair Value	TUSK Upside
Bayesian DCF	Intrinsic	$221.41	-96.0%	$1.63	-49.1%
Earnings Power Value	Intrinsic	$1639.47	-70.6%	—	—
EROIC Spread	Intrinsic	$•••.••	••.•%	$•••.••	••.•%
First Chicago	Scenario	$•••.••	••.•%	$•••.••	••.•%
Markov DDM	Intrinsic	$•••.••	••.•%	$•••.••	••.•%
ML-RIV	Intrinsic	$•••.••	••.•%	$•••.••	••.•%
Dynamic NAV	Asset-Based	$2429.60	-51.9%	$3.63	+13.2%
PWERM	Option-Based	$•••.••	••.•%	$•••.••	••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional	Relative	$•••.••	••.•%	$•••.••	••.•%
Sentiment SOTP	Hybrid	$•••.••	••.•%	$•••.••	••.•%
CUCE Ensemble	Ensemble	$•••.••	••.•%	$•••.••	••.•%
FTNN Topology	Relative	$•••.••	••.•%	$•••.••	••.•%

🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for SEB vs TUSK — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

SEB vs TUSK — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

SEB scores higher with a 8.6/10 quality rating vs TUSK's 5.0/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Seaboard Corporation (SEB) and Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (TUSK) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

SEB currently trades at $5047.22 with a QOC of 8.6/10, while TUSK trades at $3.21 with a QOC of 5.0/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).