Quick Summary — SBSI scores higher on quality with 8.0/10 vs SFNC's 6.9/10. SBSI trades at $32.77 while SFNC trades at $21.39. Both analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR data across 13 institutional models.
SBSI scores higher with a 8.0/10 quality rating vs SFNC's 6.9/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.
At $32.77, SBSI trades +0.1% above its Bayesian DCF fair value of $32.73, while SFNC at $21.39 trades +20.8% above its estimate of $16.93. SFNC shows a wider gap between price and intrinsic value.
SBSI earns a Quality of Company score of 8.0/10 compared to SFNC's 6.9/10. This moderate difference suggests one company has an edge in fundamental quality, though both may offer investment merit depending on valuation. The QOC score synthesizes 32 signals spanning profitability margins, revenue growth, free cash flow, capital allocation, and leverage.
SBSI carries a SAFE value trap risk (8/100) while SFNC shows SAFE risk (12/100). Both companies show manageable value trap risk, suggesting their current valuations are not artificially depressed by fundamental deterioration.
Both SBSI and SFNC operate in Banks - Regional, which has 329 stocks tracked by CirclFi. Same-industry comparisons provide the most direct insight into relative valuation since both companies face similar regulatory environments, market dynamics, and competitive pressures. Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN), and ensemble methods (CUCE).
11 hidden models compare SBSI vs SFNC differently — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more. Some may disagree with the 2 you see above.
Bloomberg Terminal: ~$2,000/mo · FactSet: ~$1,000/mo · CirclFi: $0.90/day
See All 13 Models — $0.90/dayWe don’t predict prices. We show you what 13 independent mathematical frameworks say a stock is worth — and let you decide.