SBLK vs STNG

Star Bulk Carriers Corp. vs Scorpio Tankers Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

SBLK

Deep Sea Foreign Transportation of Freight
Star Bulk Carriers Corp.
Quality
7.5
out of 10
Value Trap
20
SAFE
Price
$27.25
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

STNG

Deep Sea Foreign Transportation of Freight
Scorpio Tankers Inc.
Quality
7.7
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$74.51
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType SBLK Fair ValueSBLK Upside STNG Fair ValueSTNG Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $22.39 -17.8% $101.57 +36.3%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $24.31 -10.8% $97.87 +31.4%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for SBLK vs STNG — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

SBLK vs STNG — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

STNG scores higher with a 7.7/10 quality rating vs SBLK's 7.5/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK) and Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

SBLK currently trades at $27.25 with a QOC of 7.5/10, while STNG trades at $74.51 with a QOC of 7.7/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).