SARO vs TATT

StandardAero, Inc. vs TAT Technologies Ltd. — Valuation Comparison 2026

SARO

Aircraft Engines & Engine Parts
StandardAero, Inc.
Quality
9.0
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$28.64
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

TATT

Aircraft Engines & Engine Parts
TAT Technologies Ltd.
Quality
2.1
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$43.31
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType SARO Fair ValueSARO Upside TATT Fair ValueTATT Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $3.56 -87.6% $7.55 -82.6%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $9.16 -68.0% $4.75 -86.9%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for SARO vs TATT — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

SARO vs TATT — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

SARO scores higher with a 9.0/10 quality rating vs TATT's 2.1/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing StandardAero, Inc. (SARO) and TAT Technologies Ltd. (TATT) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

SARO currently trades at $28.64 with a QOC of 9.0/10, while TATT trades at $43.31 with a QOC of 2.1/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).