SAN vs UBS

Banco Santander, S.A. Sponsored vs UBS Group AG Registered — Valuation Comparison 2026

SAN

Banks - Diversified
Banco Santander, S.A. Sponsored
Quality
1.7
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$12.41
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

UBS

Banks - Diversified
UBS Group AG Registered
Quality
2.1
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$46.84
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType SAN Fair ValueSAN Upside UBS Fair ValueUBS Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $4.14 -66.7% $16.65 -64.5%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $4.68 -60.9% $137.48 +204.1%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for SAN vs UBS — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

SAN vs UBS — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

UBS scores higher with a 2.1/10 quality rating vs SAN's 1.7/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Banco Santander, S.A. Sponsored (SAN) and UBS Group AG Registered (UBS) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

SAN currently trades at $12.41 with a QOC of 1.7/10, while UBS trades at $46.84 with a QOC of 2.1/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).