SAM vs TAP

Boston Beer Company, Inc. (The) vs Molson Coors Beverage Company — Valuation Comparison 2026

SAM

Beverages - Brewers
Boston Beer Company, Inc. (The)
Quality
7.8
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$180.45
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

TAP

Beverages - Brewers
Molson Coors Beverage Company
Quality
6.4
out of 10
Value Trap
32
LOW
Price
$40.57
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType SAM Fair ValueSAM Upside TAP Fair ValueTAP Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $246.26 +36.5% $26.87 -33.8%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $65.60 -63.6% $7.01 -82.7%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for SAM vs TAP — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

SAM vs TAP — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

SAM scores higher with a 7.8/10 quality rating vs TAP's 6.4/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Boston Beer Company, Inc. (The) (SAM) and Molson Coors Beverage Company (TAP) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

SAM currently trades at $180.45 with a QOC of 7.8/10, while TAP trades at $40.57 with a QOC of 6.4/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).