SAH vs UXIN

Sonic Automotive, Inc. vs Uxin Limited — Valuation Comparison 2026

SAH

Auto & Truck Dealerships
Sonic Automotive, Inc.
Quality
8.0
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$83.74
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

UXIN

Auto & Truck Dealerships
Uxin Limited
Quality
5.5
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$2.29
Last close
Models
8/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType SAH Fair ValueSAH Upside UXIN Fair ValueUXIN Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $168.66 +101.4% $0.07 -97.1%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $49.66 -40.7%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $228.11 +172.4% $3.71 +61.8%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for SAH vs UXIN — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

SAH vs UXIN — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

SAH scores higher with a 8.0/10 quality rating vs UXIN's 5.5/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Sonic Automotive, Inc. (SAH) and Uxin Limited (UXIN) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

SAH currently trades at $83.74 with a QOC of 8.0/10, while UXIN trades at $2.29 with a QOC of 5.5/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).