RPID vs WAT

Rapid Micro Biosystems, Inc. vs Waters Corporation — Valuation Comparison 2026

RPID

Laboratory Analytical Instruments
Rapid Micro Biosystems, Inc.
Quality
6.1
out of 10
Value Trap
36
LOW
Price
$2.01
Last close
Models
9/13
Active
VS

WAT

Laboratory Analytical Instruments
Waters Corporation
Quality
5.7
out of 10
Value Trap
23
SAFE
Price
$383.57
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType RPID Fair ValueRPID Upside WAT Fair ValueWAT Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $0.49 -75.5% $15.47 -96.0%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $36.66 -89.7%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $0.93 -53.8% $242.85 -36.7%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for RPID vs WAT — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

RPID vs WAT — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

RPID scores higher with a 6.1/10 quality rating vs WAT's 5.7/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Rapid Micro Biosystems, Inc. (RPID) and Waters Corporation (WAT) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

RPID currently trades at $2.01 with a QOC of 6.1/10, while WAT trades at $383.57 with a QOC of 5.7/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).